Semantic vs. pragmatic definites: Evidence for presupposition cost from sentence processing
ثبت نشده
چکیده
There is an ongoing debate about the meaning of definiteness and the number and types of definite entities (e.g. Russell, 1905; Strawson, 1950; Hawkins, 1978; Löbner, 1985; and many others). Definite noun phrases (NPs) include definite descriptions, demonstratives, pronouns, possessive constructions, proper names, or NPs with a universal quantifier as determiner, and research has focused on which properties are shared by these entities and how they differ from one another. Researchers have for instance been arguing over whether proper names and definite descriptions share the same features (e.g. Geurts, 1997) or whether they are fundamentally different (e.g. Kripke, 1972).
منابع مشابه
Two Types of Definites: Evidence for Presupposition Cost
This paper investigates the notion of definiteness from a psycholinguistic perspective and addresses Löbner’s (1987) distinction between semantic and pragmatic definites. To this end inherently definite noun phrases, proper names, and indexicals are investigated as instances of (relatively) rigid designators (i.e. semantic definites) and contrasted with definite noun phrases and third person pr...
متن کاملSemantic and Pragmatic Presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory
This paper investigates semantic and pragmatic presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory (DRT) and enhances the pragmatic perspective of presupposition in DRT. In doing so, it draws attention to the need to account for agent presupposition (i.e. both speaker and hearer presupposition) when dealing with pragmatic presupposition. Furthermore, this paper links this pragmatic conception of ...
متن کامل- 1 - Presupposition without Common Ground
There are two foundational questions to ask about presupposition: What is it? And where does it come from? The philosophical work which has most influenced linguists' understanding of presupposition is that of Robert Stalnaker (Stalnaker 1973, 1974, 2002). One aspect of Stalnaker's work on presupposition is an attempt to decouple these two questions. Stalnaker does this by providing a character...
متن کاملPresuppositions as beliefs
Most theori~s of presupposition implicitly assume that pre-supposition,; are facts, and that all agents involved in a discourse share belief in the presuppositions that it generates. These unrealistic assumptions can be eliminated if each presupposition is treated as the belief of an agent. However, it ~s not enough to consider only the beliefs of the speaker; we show that the beliefs of other ...
متن کاملPresupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution
The present paper presents an anaphoric account of presupposition. It is argued that presuppositional expressions should not be seen as referring expressions, nor is presupposition to be explicated in terms of some non-standard logic. The notion of presupposition should not be relegated to a pragmatic theory either. Instead presuppositional expressions are claimed to be anaphoric expressions wh...
متن کامل